Feelings vs Facts? Science of Why We Make Bad Decisions - FutureIQ
Concepts in this episode
Browse all concepts ›-
False-Consensus Effect mental-model
The false-consensus effect is the habit of treating your own choice as the normal choice. Once you choose a side, you tend to imagine that most other people chose it too.
-
Belief Perseverance mental-model
Once a judgment is made, new evidence must overcome not only the original belief but the urge to defend having chosen it. A conclusion can quietly change from a hypothesis into a position.
-
Cherry Picking mechanism
When many studies or facts exist, selectively amplifying favorable results and burying unfavorable ones can manufacture a convincing public picture. The distortion requires neither fabricated evidence nor universal dishonesty—only control over which truths receive attention.
-
Steel Manning principle
Make better decisions by comparing the strongest arguments from capable advocates on opposing sides. This prevents a weak or caricatured opponent from creating false confidence.
-
Dunning-Kruger Effect mental-model
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a double failure: weak skill produces poor performance while also withholding the diagnostic skill needed to recognize it. Confidence is therefore not evidence of competence—and doubt can sometimes signal that a person knows enough to see the difficulty.
-
Backfire Effect mental-model
Directly attacking a belief can strengthen it when disagreement is experienced as a threat to identity: reasoning shifts from examining the claim to defending the self and the tribe. Persuasion works better when both sides can investigate the subject without first becoming opponents.
-
Illusion of Information Adequacy mental-model
Missing evidence does not feel like a gap. A coherent one-sided account can therefore produce the same sense of informational sufficiency as a more complete view.
-
Red Teaming principle
Assign someone to build the strongest case against a claim before you commit to it. Red teaming exposes missing evidence and gives weak conclusions a chance to be revised or abandoned while the cost is still low.
Description
Transcript
Subscriber transcript
Subscribe to @TheFutureIQ, then sign in with Google to unlock full transcripts and transcript search.
Sign in with Google