Retributive Justice
Retributive justice treats identifying and punishing the offender as the central measure of success. The sentence may close the legal case while leaving the victim’s losses and recovery largely untouched.
An offender can be punished and the justice system can still have done nothing for the victim. The case counts as resolved because the state achieved its objective, even though the person harmed may be no closer to repair or ordinary life.
E1When punishment becomes the scoreboard
The mismatch begins with what the system is organized to produce. Once success is defined as establishing guilt and imposing a penalty, attention flows toward the offender: what can be proved, which rule was broken, and what punishment follows. The victim’s recovery is a different task, so it can remain outside the institutional scoreboard.
This is why a legal victory and human repair can diverge. Punishment answers what should happen to the offender; it does not automatically answer what would repair the harm. Restorative Justice starts from that neglected second question.
E1A criticism of priority, not proof against punishment
The supplied material establishes that an offender-focused system can neglect victims; it does not establish that punishment is always useless, or that repair alone can satisfy every demand justice must meet. The model identifies a missing outcome rather than proving that one response should wholly replace another.
E1Episodes that teach this
-
Was Old Justice System Better? Is the New Justice System Broken?
· explained at 7:13
5,049 views
The modern system was described as "focused only on punishing the offender" and doing "nothing for the victim."