Anti-Principle Test

mental-model

A principle earns its name only when choosing it costs you something. Reveal its substance by naming the anti-principle: the competing value, option, or resource it asks you to sacrifice.

In an episode about making faster decisions, the sharpest question is not whether a principle sounds wise. It is: what do I have to give up? Advice that demands no sacrifice may be describing universal goodness rather than guiding a decision.

E1

A principle must exclude something

Decisions exist because desirable values collide. A real principle resolves that collision by ranking one value above another; its anti-principle names what loses. Asking for that opposite works like Socratic questioning: it makes the hidden ranking explicit. It also gives the claim a failure condition, separating usable guidance from a story that can justify anything.

E1

A cost proves substance, not wisdom

Finding a tradeoff does not show that the principle is correct, only that it has operational meaning. Whether its ranking is sensible still depends on the domain; like the validity-of-intuition, a rule that works in one environment can mislead when the underlying conditions change.

Write the rejected sentence

Before adopting a piece of advice tomorrow, complete two lines: “This principle prioritizes ___” and “Its anti-principle prioritizes ___ instead.” Then name the specific time, money, speed, certainty, or alternative you will surrender. If you cannot fill in the second line or identify a cost, do not use the advice to make the decision.

E1

Episodes that teach this